chris_chi24 said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Second this. Posting only so the count is not one.
lisa_labSD said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemNurseAsh_DET said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.