Dr.PeteFamMed said:Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.
Dr.PeteFamMed said:Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
Worth restating a point from upthread for anyone joining at this page:
It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
This was answered several pages up and is worth repeating rather than re-litigating:
Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
wendy_avl said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Pushing back on wendy_avl here. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.