Nov 26, 2025 at 8:42 AM#86
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
39 12amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dec 5, 2025 at 1:01 PM#87
HPLC_Greg said:Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
Last edited: Dec 5, 2025 at 2:01 PM
40 13JenMemphis, pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dec 14, 2025 at 5:16 PM#88
HPLC_Greg said:Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…
That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.
Last edited: Dec 14, 2025 at 11:16 PM
41 14james_edin, FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsJan 2, 2026 at 1:28 AM#90
Worth restating a point from upthread for anyone joining at this page:
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
Last edited: Jan 2, 2026 at 2:28 AM
14 12FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report