BiostatsBrad said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
BiostatsBrad said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
That reframing is the part I needed. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.EndoEP said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Reporting back.
For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.