carlos_SATX said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Nothing to add that would improve it.
carlos_SATX said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Nothing to add that would improve it.
carlos_SATX said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
Coming at carlos_SATX’s question from a different direction. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsBiostatsBrad said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.