One thing that is still open after VendorMark’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
A1cHero_PHX said:Update: the thing I was blaming turned out not to be the cause.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.
A1cHero_PHX said:Update: the thing I was blaming turned out not to be the cause.
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsA1cHero_PHX said:Update: the thing I was blaming turned out not to be the cause.
That reframing is the part I needed. Taking it to my next appointment.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Happy to go further on any of that.