Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Closing the loop on my own question.
Update — I came back down one step, held for a month, then went up again and it was uneventful the second time. Same ladder, slower.
A1cHero_PHX said:Update — I came back down one step, held for a month, then went up again and it was uneventful the second time.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsA1cHero_PHX said:Update — I came back down one step, held for a month, then went up again and it was uneventful the second time.
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
A1cHero_PHX said:Update — I came back down one step, held for a month, then went up again and it was uneventful the second time.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.