JessicaM_2024 said:I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Second this.
JessicaM_2024 said:I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Second this.
JessicaM_2024 said:I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Coming at JessicaM_2024’s question from a different direction. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
HPLC_Greg said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.