🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingCOA red flag compilation — what worked for you? Page 5

COA red flag compilation — what worked for you?

mike_nyc Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 10:51 PM 36 replies 2,728 viewsPage 5 of 8
lucas_SP_BR
Member
456
1,890
Jun 2024
São Paulo, BR
Apr 14, 2024 at 6:06 PM#21

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.

42 15NurseKim_ATL, paul_denver, TinaHashiRN and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
amy_econ_NJ
Member
567
2,567
May 2024
Princeton, NJ
Apr 23, 2024 at 3:29 PM#22

One thing that is still open after SarahChen_PharmD’s answer:

Whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong?

43 16hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
hans_munich
Member
534
2,345
Jul 2024
Munich, DE
May 2, 2024 at 12:46 PM#23
lucas_SP_BR said:
Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

Pushing back on lucas_SP_BR here. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.

44 17Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
FranDenver
Member
267
1,123
Oct 2024
Denver, CO
May 11, 2024 at 9:58 AM#24
lucas_SP_BR said:
Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.

45 18MASHdoc_SA, GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SandraNC_45
Member
312
1,345
Sep 2024
Charlotte, NC
May 20, 2024 at 7:05 AM#25
lucas_SP_BR said:
Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them.

46 19Dr.PainCLE, mike_mealprep, NicoleRaleigh and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register