🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHas anyone dealt with moisture content analysis for lyophilized peptides? Page 5

Has anyone dealt with moisture content analysis for lyophilized peptides?

newstart_MO Thu, May 30, 2024 at 8:42 AM 54 replies 2,788 viewsPage 5 of 11
nick_SD_fit
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
San Diego, CA
Jun 29, 2024 at 11:30 PM#21

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

How long did you give it before you decided it was working?

9 7SkepticalSean, Dr.CardioMD, EndoResFellow and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
pete_RVA
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Richmond, VA
Jul 11, 2024 at 8:02 PM#22
andrew_nyc said:
My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 3 times from my current compounder.

Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis. I've tested my last 3 batches through Janoshik and purity has ranged from 99.8% to 99.0%. Consistency is key.

For anyone new: always request the COA, and consider independent verification. The $300 for a Janoshik test is worth the peace of mind.

10 8Dr.Martinez, mike_mod, SarahChen_PharmD and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
AttorneyGrant
Member
567
2,890
Apr 2024
Washington, DC
Jul 23, 2024 at 4:27 PM#23
andrew_nyc said:
My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 3 times from my current compounder.

That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

11 9JenMemphis, pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
DadBodDave
Member
187
923
Nov 2024
Ohio
Aug 4, 2024 at 12:45 PM#24
andrew_nyc said:
My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 3 times from my current compounder.

Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. I will report back once I have actually tried it.

12 10Dr.GastroMayo, JakeBK_lifts, DerekSJ_a1c and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sean_dublin
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Dublin, IE
Aug 16, 2024 at 8:57 AM#25

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

13 11quinn_sf, NurseLeah_Nash, gary_naperville and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
13456711

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register