🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingLC-MS/MS vs HPLC for peptide analysis — November 2025 Page 4

LC-MS/MS vs HPLC for peptide analysis — November 2025

Dr.SportsMedIN Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 3:37 PM 51 replies 2,260 viewsPage 4 of 11
Dr.ReproEndo
Senior Member
1,890
8,901
Jan 2024
Scottsdale, AZ
Aug 1, 2024 at 11:11 AM#16

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 5 times from my current compounder. Consistency has been excellent.

Shipping: Same-day local pickup
Packaging: Professional, discreet, proper labeling with lot/batch numbers
Purity: 97.6% average across orders (Janoshik verified)
Customer service: Responsive within 6 hours
Price: $150/month for semaglutide 2.4mg equivalent

16 14mona_PHX, andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TrialTracker_MD
Senior Member
2,345
15,678
Jan 2024
Maryland
Aug 3, 2024 at 1:33 AM#17
DoseLogDan said:
HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean: Purity %: Should be…

Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis. I've tested my last 3 batches through Janoshik and purity has ranged from 98.8% to 99.4%. Consistency is key.

For anyone new: always request the COA, and consider independent verification. The $300 for a Janoshik test is worth the peace of mind.

Last edited: Aug 3, 2024 at 6:33 AM
17 15stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago, pete_RVA and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
cory_ATX
Member
456
2,123
Jul 2024
Austin, TX
Aug 4, 2024 at 3:55 PM#18

Following on from DoseLogDan — and this may be the naive question:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

18 16mona_PHX, andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
gary_naperville
Member
245
1,123
Oct 2024
Naperville, IL
Aug 6, 2024 at 6:16 AM#19
TrialTracker_MD said:
Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis.

I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 99.2% purity. That's within acceptable range for compounded peptides. Turnaround was 14 business days.

The test costs ~$146 but gives you actual HPLC chromatography data plus mass spec confirmation. For the peace of mind alone, it's worth every penny. I test every new batch from a new vendor.

19 17PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Aug 7, 2024 at 8:36 PM#20

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.

41 14PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register