From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
TrialNerd_Beth said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. Posting only so the count is not one.
TrialNerd_Beth said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Coming at TrialNerd_Beth’s question from a different direction. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne concrete data point for the thread. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
One thing that is still open after TrialNerd_Beth’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?