DoseLogDan said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
DoseLogDan said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
DoseLogDan said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Taking it to my next appointment.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultsjulia.endo said:There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Mine went the same way, slower. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Closing the loop on my own question.
For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.