🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMASH / Liver DiseaseHas anyone dealt with had a fibroscan and do not understand my results - help? Page 5

Has anyone dealt with had a fibroscan and do not understand my results - help?

pat_auckland Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 7:32 AM 42 replies 2,471 viewsPage 5 of 9
jim_asheville
Member
289
1,234
Aug 2024
Asheville, NC
Apr 6, 2024 at 7:37 PM#21
GenomicsKate said:
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.

Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.

Last edited: Apr 6, 2024 at 10:37 PM
6 4MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
CryptoCarl
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Arizona
Apr 7, 2024 at 3:59 AM#22
GenomicsKate said:
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.

Last edited: Apr 7, 2024 at 7:59 AM
7 5MariaRD, AussieAnna, BethLabQueen and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
jason_paloalto
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Palo Alto, CA
Apr 7, 2024 at 12:20 PM#23

One concrete data point for the thread. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.

8 6mona_PHX, andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
SallyK_inj
Member
567
2,345
Jul 2024
Iowa
Apr 7, 2024 at 8:41 PM#24

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

How long did you give it before you decided it was working?

Last edited: Apr 7, 2024 at 9:41 PM
9 7tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MikeFit_NJ
Senior Member
1,567
6,543
Apr 2024
New Jersey
Apr 8, 2024 at 5:02 AM#25
jason_paloalto said:
If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.

I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.

10 8Dr.EndoIndy, tom_AK, josh_phd_bmore and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1345679

Similar Threads

Survodutide MASH Phase 2b — histological improvement data9 replies
Semaglutide and MASH — liver fat reduction quantification13 replies
Non-invasive MASH biomarkers — FibroScan, ELF, FIB-4 on GLP-110 replies
ALT normalization rates on GLP-1 — pooled trial data20 replies
GLP-1 hepatoprotection — direct vs indirect mechanisms16 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register