GenomicsKate said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
GenomicsKate said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
GenomicsKate said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
One concrete data point for the thread. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
jason_paloalto said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.