Has anyone dealt with had a fibroscan and do not understand my results - help?

Dr.NateNeph said:

Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…

I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.

Dr.NateNeph said:

Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…

Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.

Dr.GastroMayo said:

The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.

Mine went the same way, slower.