amy_econ_NJ said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Posting only so the count is not one.
amy_econ_NJ said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after amy_econ_NJ’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
DoseLogDan said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.