🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHas anyone dealt with moisture content analysis for lyophilized peptides?

Has anyone dealt with moisture content analysis for lyophilized peptides?

AttorneyGrant Sat, Mar 14, 2026 at 11:18 PM 21 replies 910 viewsPage 1 of 5
AttorneyGrant
Member
567
2,890
Apr 2024
Washington, DC
Mar 14, 2026 at 11:18 PM#1

I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or contradictory.

The narrow version of the question is whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

Not looking for reassurance. Looking for the part I have got wrong.

49 19Dr.SleepRoch, laura_annarbor, JenMemphis and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LibrarianMeg
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Mar 2024
Baltimore, MD
Mar 15, 2026 at 12:29 AM#2

Taking the question as asked, rather than the general version of it. The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers. Does the report name the batch on your vial. Is the date consistent with when that batch existed. Is it addressed to the vendor or to the person who paid for the test. Was the sample taken from general stock or supplied by the vendor. A perfect certificate for a different batch is worth nothing, and vendor-supplied samples are the most common way a genuine report ends up misleading.

Last edited: Mar 15, 2026 at 2:29 AM
48 18PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo, JessicaM_2024 and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_nyc
VIP Member
5,678
21,345
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Mar 15, 2026 at 1:40 AM#3
LibrarianMeg said:
The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers.

That is correct as far as it goes, and here is where it stops going. One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable. "99% pure" without the technique, the standard and the conditions is a claim, not a measurement.

47 17Dr.EM_Chicago, pete_RVA, CarlaRPh_TPA and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
hannah_MT
New Member
23
89
Feb 2026
Bozeman, MT
Mar 15, 2026 at 2:51 AM#4
AttorneyGrant said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so. Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself calibrated, the gradient and column, the detection wavelength, and where the integration baseline was drawn. A percentage point or two between competent labs is expected. What is not expected is a large gap, and the usual explanation there is that one report is not of the batch in your hand.

46 16PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
GenomicsKate
Member
345
1,890
Oct 2024
Cambridge, MA
Mar 15, 2026 at 9:38 AM#5

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight. This confirms identity — not just purity.

Why this matters: HPLC can show you a "pure" compound, but if it's pure of the WRONG compound, purity is meaningless. Mass spec at m/z 4113.58 Da confirms it's actually semaglutide. My Janoshik report includes both HPLC and mass spec.

If your testing provider only offers HPLC, consider upgrading to include mass spec for at least your first batch from a new vendor.

45 15claudia_zurich, nancy_portland, rick_sfbay and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1235

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register