Had a FibroScan and do not understand my results - help — looking for input

tane_welly said:

Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.

Same pattern here, and in the same order.

tane_welly said:

Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.

One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

How long did you give it before you decided it was working?

anders_CPH said:

If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.