Following on from NurseAsh_DET — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
DoseLogDan said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
DoseLogDan said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDoseLogDan said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Taking it to my next appointment.
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong. The measurement I was reading had moved less than its own week-to-week variation, which somebody said upthread and I did not believe.