🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsExercise & Body CompositionResistance training prevents 73% lean mass loss on semaglutide — RCT review Page 2

Resistance training prevents 73% lean mass loss on semaglutide — RCT review

MikeFit_NJ Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 6:43 AM 11 replies 220 viewsPage 2 of 3
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
Jun 8, 2026 at 7:46 AM#6
MikeFit_NJ said:
There is also a quality change that the scan cannot see.

OMG yes. lean mass + resistance training is the combo. Can confirm.

7 2VendorMark, COA_Karl, MikeFit_NJ and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MikeKY_noInsulin
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
Louisville, KY
Jun 8, 2026 at 8:11 AM#7

One thing that is still open after Dr.SurgeonPGH’s answer:

Whether resistance training and protein change the ratio or only the absolute amount?

Last edited: Jun 8, 2026 at 11:11 AM
6 1hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.ObesityLA
VIP Member
3,567
19,876
Dec 2023
Los Angeles, CA
Jun 8, 2026 at 8:35 AM#8
DataDave said:
lean mass + resistance training is the combo.

Coming at DataDave’s question from a different direction. Training does two things here and only one of them is on the scale. It protects lean mass — which is the reason to do it — and it contributes modestly to the deficit, which is the reason people start and then quit when the arithmetic disappoints them. In a deep deficit, resistance work is the priority and high-volume cardio competes with recovery.

Happy to go further on any of that.

5 0tampaLisa73, KarenAZ_mom, zoe_NC and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
MikeFit_NJ
Senior Member
1,567
6,543
Apr 2024
New Jersey
Jun 8, 2026 at 9:00 AM#9

Closing the loop on my own question.

Second scan under matched conditions, six months apart, same time of day: the lean number came back nearly a kilo higher than the panic scan. Strength was up throughout.

Last edited: Jun 8, 2026 at 12:00 PM
4 24SandraNC_45, Dr.EndoIndy, tom_AK and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
adam_van
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Vancouver, CA
Jun 8, 2026 at 10:57 AM#10
Dr.ObesityLA said:
Training does two things here and only one of them is on the scale.

Right, and protein targets should be set on a reference weight rather than current weight. Setting 1.6 g/kg on a starting weight of 130kg produces a target nobody hits on a suppressed appetite.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

Last edited: Jun 8, 2026 at 2:57 PM
28 1hyun_seoul, jim_asheville, matt_MKE and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 months on GLP-1 + lifting18 replies
Zone 2 cardio + GLP-1: synergistic metabolic benefits — evidence18 replies
Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — exercise-induced or concerning?14 replies
Body recomposition protocol: GLP-1 + progressive overload + high protein8 replies
Walking 10,000 steps/day impact on GLP-1 weight loss — pedometer study6 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register