Taking the question as asked, rather than the general version of it. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
I have used three payment routes and the only thing that changed with each was how much leverage I had when something went wrong.
What I actually want to know is how people are thinking about the trade-off between reversibility and privacy, because you cannot have both.
Practical detail welcome, however dull — the duller the better.
KevinCompounds said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
No disagreement with KevinCompounds. One condition attached. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsGraceAZ_72 said:I have used three payment routes and the only thing that changed with each was how much leverage I had when something went wrong.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.