Swiss Chems got an FDA warning letter — my results so far

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.

Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.

pat_auckland said:

The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. Posting only so the count is not one.

pat_auckland said:

The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.

Coming at pat_auckland’s question from a different direction. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

One concrete data point for the thread. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.

Reporting back.

Reporting back for the archive rather than for the thread: I did the narrow version of what was suggested, gave it the full interval, and it settled. Posting it because threads without a follow-up are half a thread.