lisa_labSD said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
TrialTracker_MD said:For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.EM_Chicago said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.