PedsEndoPhilly said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
PedsEndoPhilly said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
pete_nash said:Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.
That reframing is the part I needed. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
PedsEndoPhilly said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.