Dec 16, 2025 at 5:44 PM#21
Following on from JenPlateau — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
41 14rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dec 28, 2025 at 2:10 AM#22
MaxMetOK said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
Last edited: Dec 28, 2025 at 7:10 AM
42 15Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX, andrew_nyc and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jan 8, 2026 at 10:29 AM#23
MaxMetOK said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Agreed, and the practical implication is not to over-read a single eGFR during a period of rapid loss and altered hydration. Trend, with UACR beside it.
43 16DadBodDave, AmyNC_wife, SkepticalSean and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsJan 19, 2026 at 6:42 PM#24
MaxMetOK said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework.
44 17SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jan 31, 2026 at 2:48 AM#25
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
45 18lori_vegas, Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report