VendorMark said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.
SleepDoc_PDX said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemFollowing on from SleepDoc_PDX — and this may be the naive question:
Whether normalised enzymes tell you anything about fibrosis, and what the right follow-up measurement is?
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.