🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesTirzepatide cardiovascular safety — looking for input Page 5

Tirzepatide cardiovascular safety — looking for input

nancy_portland Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 3:19 PM 36 replies 2,184 viewsPage 5 of 8
jason_sac26
New Member
34
123
Jan 2026
Sacramento, CA
Jan 27, 2025 at 6:32 AM#21
Dr.GutHealth said:
I want to bring up the cardiovascular angle on cardiovascular risk.

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.

16 14pete_RVA, CarlaRPh_TPA, steph_laguna and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PeteFamMed
Senior Member
2,012
9,234
Jan 2024
Minneapolis, MN
Jan 27, 2025 at 1:32 PM#22

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

Senior perspective on cardiovascular risk: I'm 65 years old and started this journey skeptically. My geriatrician recommended it after years of failed interventions.

9 months later: down 48 lbs, more mobile, pain reduced, medications simplified. My quality of life has improved dramatically. I wish this existed 20 years ago.

To other older adults hesitating: the SELECT trial proved benefit in our age group. You deserve to feel good in your body regardless of age.

Last edited: Jan 27, 2025 at 2:32 PM
17 15tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul, jim_asheville and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
RegAffairsDC
Member
678
3,456
May 2024
Washington, DC
Jan 27, 2025 at 8:32 PM#23
Dr.PeteFamMed said:
Senior perspective on cardiovascular risk: I'm 65 years old and started this journey skeptically.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

18 16hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
NeuroNate
Senior Member
2,890
16,789
Dec 2023
Chicago, IL
Jan 28, 2025 at 3:33 AM#24
Dr.PeteFamMed said:
Senior perspective on cardiovascular risk: I'm 65 years old and started this journey skeptically.

NNT calculation for cardiovascular risk clinical endpoints: NNT = 1/ARR (absolute risk reduction).

From SELECT trial: MACE at 39 months — 6.5% semaglutide vs 8.0% placebo. ARR = 1.5%. NNT = 67 over 3.3 years.

Compare to established therapies:

InterventionNNTTimeframe
Semaglutide (MACE)673.3 years
Statins primary prevention (MI)~1005 years
Aspirin secondary prevention~772 years

These NNTs are clinically meaningful and comparable to accepted cardiovascular interventions.

19 17kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO, wendy_avl and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
josh_phd_bmore
Member
389
1,678
Jul 2024
Baltimore, MD
Jan 28, 2025 at 10:34 AM#25
Dr.PeteFamMed said:
Senior perspective on cardiovascular risk: I'm 65 years old and started this journey skeptically.

Lp(a) and cardiovascular risk: a nuance that matters. Unlike most lipid markers, Lp(a) is 90%+ genetically determined and doesn't really change with weight loss or GLP-1 therapy.

My Lp(a) has remained at 43 nmol/L across all time points. If yours is elevated (>50 nmol/L), you need additional risk mitigation strategies regardless of your GLP-1 response. Don't assume your medication is covering all cardiovascular risk factors.

20 18tampaLisa73, KarenAZ_mom, zoe_NC and 17 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register