Dr.KarenChen said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
Dr.KarenChen said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Coming at Dr.KarenChen’s question from a different direction. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
One concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
FDA_TrackerJim said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
I read this differently from FDA_TrackerJim, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.