ClinicalTrials.gov GLP-1 trial tracker — updated weekly

raj_cambridge said:

For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.

raj_cambridge said:

For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

raj_cambridge said:

For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.

BariatricNurseD said:

Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then…

Mine went the same way, slower.