🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsClinical Trials & ResearchClinicalTrials.gov GLP-1 trial tracker — updated weekly Page 13

ClinicalTrials.gov GLP-1 trial tracker — updated weekly

TrialTracker_MD Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 4:00 PM 411 replies 11,865 viewsPage 13 of 20
DoseLogDan
Member
201
567
Feb 2025
Montana
Feb 19, 2025 at 10:00 PM#61

One concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.

Last edited: Feb 19, 2025 at 11:00 PM
2 0newstart_MO, mia_MS2
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MikeKY_noInsulin
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
Louisville, KY
Feb 28, 2025 at 2:33 AM#62

Following on from Dr.NutriCornell — and this may be the naive question:

How long did you give it before you decided it was working?

3 1hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ
Reply Quote Save Share Report
CryptoCarl
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Arizona
Mar 8, 2025 at 7:01 AM#63

Found this through search years later and it is still the best discussion of the question, so adding one thing. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.

4 2AussieAnna, BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
TrialTracker_MD
Senior Member
2,345
15,678
Jan 2024
Maryland
Mar 16, 2025 at 11:25 AM#64

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Closing this out. What actually changed my mind was the point about waiting for a trend instead of reading a single measurement, which is embarrassing in hindsight and worth saying anyway.

5 3Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona, stefan_berlin and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
carlos_SATX
Member
245
1,123
Oct 2024
San Antonio, TX
Mar 24, 2025 at 3:44 PM#65
DoseLogDan said:
Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Taking it to my next appointment.

6 4tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul, jim_asheville and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

FLOW trial: semaglutide renal outcomes — NEJM publication review14 replies
SELECT trial: semaglutide 2.4mg cardiovascular outcomes — 4yr data9 replies
TRIUMPH program (retatrutide) — Phase 3 trial design and endpoints13 replies
Orforglipron ATTAIN trials — oral non-peptide GLP-1 agonist8 replies
CagriSema (amylin + semaglutide) — REDEFINE Phase 3 results20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register