🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPublic SquareGLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — what worked for you?

GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — what worked for you?

pam_columbus Sun, Dec 21, 2025 at 7:19 PM 11 replies 1,075 viewsPage 1 of 3
pam_columbus
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Columbus, OH
Dec 21, 2025 at 7:19 PM#1

My prescriber wanted a baseline TSH and did not want a calcitonin, and I would like to understand the reasoning rather than just accepting it.

The narrow version of the question is why calcitonin screening is not recommended when the label carries a thyroid warning, because those two facts look contradictory from the outside.

Not looking for reassurance. Looking for the part I have got wrong.

35 5kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE, mike_mealprep and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.SurgeonPGH
Senior Member
1,345
6,789
Mar 2024
Pittsburgh, PA
Dec 21, 2025 at 7:44 PM#2

This one has a reasonably settled answer, so here it is. The pharmacokinetics explain nearly every practical question asked here. Albumin binding above 99% slows clearance enough to make weekly dosing possible; a terminal half-life near a week means four to five weeks to steady state and therefore a four-week titration interval; subcutaneous bioavailability around 89% means injection site barely matters. Those three facts answer most timing questions before they are asked.

34 4TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan, SleepFixSam and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LondonLisa
Member
912
3,456
Mar 2024
London, UK
Dec 21, 2025 at 8:09 PM#3
Dr.SurgeonPGH said:
The pharmacokinetics explain nearly every practical question asked here.

Agreed, and the adaptation point cuts both ways: tachyphylaxis to gastric emptying is why tolerability improves, and it is also why people who were relying on physical fullness feel the effect fade while the appetite effect is still working.

33 3RetaRick_CA, JenPlateau, SallyK_inj and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
GraceAZ_72
Member
156
678
Jan 2025
Tucson, AZ
Dec 21, 2025 at 8:34 PM#4
pam_columbus said:
My prescriber wanted a baseline TSH and did not want a calcitonin, and I would like to understand the reasoning rather than just accepting it.

Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Posting only so the count is not one.

32 2JenPlateau, SallyK_inj, CryptoCarl and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
anna.melb_AU
Member
678
2,890
Apr 2024
Melbourne, AU
Dec 21, 2025 at 10:49 PM#5

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

Thyroid cancer screening labs for thyroid monitoring — addressing the boxed warning concern with actual data:

Calcitonin level: 4.0 pg/mL (normal <10). Checked at baseline, month 6, and month 12. Rock stable, no upward trend.

Thyroid ultrasound: normal, no nodules at month 12.

The MTC risk from rodent studies has not been confirmed in human post-marketing data across millions of patient-years. The boxed warning is a regulatory precaution based on animal data. While monitoring is prudent, the clinical risk appears to be negligible.

31 1Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction16 replies
GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey — comprehensive data log20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register