BiostatsBrad said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
BiostatsBrad said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemDr.RheumBOS said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Mine went the same way, slower.
Dr.RheumBOS said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Coming at Dr.RheumBOS’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.