fiona_VT said:Follow-up — I put something in the gap where food used to be rather than waiting for the gap to close on its own.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
fiona_VT said:Follow-up — I put something in the gap where food used to be rather than waiting for the gap to close on its own.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
fiona_VT said:Follow-up — I put something in the gap where food used to be rather than waiting for the gap to close on its own.
Coming at fiona_VT’s question from a different direction. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemBiostatsBrad said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.