🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPublic SquareMuscle protein synthesis rates on GLP-1 — leucine threshold discussion Page 5

Muscle protein synthesis rates on GLP-1 — leucine threshold discussion

ChrisMacros Mon, May 25, 2026 at 8:37 AM 21 replies 460 viewsPage 5 of 5
Dr.NephBHM_UK
Member
456
2,123
Jun 2024
Birmingham, UK
May 30, 2026 at 12:17 PM#21
CarlaRPh_TPA said:
The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.

23 21Dr.CardioMD, EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
BethLabQueen
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
May 2024
Virginia
Online
Jun 1, 2026 at 2:09 PM#22

One concrete data point for the thread. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

24 22Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona, stefan_berlin and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
COA_Karl
Senior Member
2,123
8,901
Jan 2024
Pennsylvania
Jun 3, 2026 at 4:03 PM#23

One thing that is still open after CarlaRPh_TPA’s answer:

What fraction of loss being lean mass is actually normal, because the numbers quoted here range from 10% to 40% and cannot all be right?

25 23hyun_seoul, jim_asheville, matt_MKE and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
Dr.NutriCornell
Senior Member
1,345
6,234
Mar 2024
Ithaca, NY
Jun 5, 2026 at 5:57 PM#24
BethLabQueen said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.

26 24JenMemphis, pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
KevinCompounds
VIP Member
5,432
18,234
Dec 2023
Nevada
Jun 7, 2026 at 7:53 PM#25
BethLabQueen said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Agreed on the ranges, with the condition that a single DEXA is not a measurement, it is one draw from a distribution. Hydration status moves the lean compartment by a kilogram or more between scans, so any comparison of scans done at different times of day or different hydration states is noise.

27 0NurseAsh_DET, BenResearch_OR, MikeKY_noInsulin and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1345

Similar Threads

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction16 replies
GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey — comprehensive data log20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register