maya_sedona said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
maya_sedona said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.
Happy to go further on any of that.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne thing that is still open after maya_sedona’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
PeptideSynthNJ said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
I read this differently from PeptideSynthNJ, on substance rather than tone. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.