Dr.RenalNash said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Dr.RenalNash said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.
One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemFollowing on from Dr.RenalNash — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
Closing the loop on my own question.
Coming back a few months on. It held. Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.