roxy_nash said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Second this. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
One thing that is still open after Dr.AddMedPHL’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDr.PeteFamMed said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
I read this differently from Dr.PeteFamMed, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.