Telehealth provider directory — need advice

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.

Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.

VendorMark said:

sophie_paris said: ...compounded vs brand cost and coverage...

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source.