lucas_SP_BR said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Nothing to add that would improve it.
lucas_SP_BR said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
Coming at lucas_SP_BR’s question from a different direction. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
One concrete data point for the thread. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after lucas_SP_BR’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
BethLabQueen said:Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…
I read this differently from BethLabQueen, on substance rather than tone. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.