pete_manc_UK said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Posting only so the count is not one.
pete_manc_UK said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Posting only so the count is not one.
pete_manc_UK said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
Coming at pete_manc_UK’s question from a different direction. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardsdave_SLC said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Pushing back on dave_SLC here. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.