Dr.PulmRoch said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Dr.PulmRoch said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
pete_RVA said:That is right for the weekly injectables.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Dr.PulmRoch said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne concrete data point for the thread. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.