SleepDoc_PDX said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
SleepDoc_PDX said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
SleepDoc_PDX said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Coming at SleepDoc_PDX’s question from a different direction. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
One concrete data point for the thread. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after SleepDoc_PDX’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
dan_philly said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Pushing back on dan_philly here. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.