OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Closing this out: I held the step for six weeks rather than four and it settled without a dose change. The interval was the answer, not the dose.
Dr.Martinez said:Closing this out: I held the step for six weeks rather than four and it settled without a dose change.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
Dr.Martinez said:Closing this out: I held the step for six weeks rather than four and it settled without a dose change.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.Martinez said:Closing this out: I held the step for six weeks rather than four and it settled without a dose change.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.