Oct 20, 2024 at 2:14 PM#31
Following on from Dr.NephBHM_UK — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
16 14Dr.Martinez, mike_mod, SarahChen_PharmD and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Oct 23, 2024 at 12:05 PM#32
lisa_labSD said:Follow-up — getting the denial reason in writing was the step that mattered.
I read this differently from lisa_labSD, on substance rather than tone. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
Last edited: Oct 23, 2024 at 6:05 PM
17 15LibrarianMeg, bri_stats, pete_manc_UK and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Oct 26, 2024 at 9:55 AM#33
lisa_labSD said:Follow-up — getting the denial reason in writing was the step that mattered.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Last edited: Oct 26, 2024 at 2:55 PM
18 16alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOct 29, 2024 at 7:43 AM#34
lisa_labSD said:Follow-up — getting the denial reason in writing was the step that mattered.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Last edited: Oct 29, 2024 at 10:43 AM
19 17PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Nov 1, 2024 at 5:29 AM#35
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Last edited: Nov 1, 2024 at 10:29 AM
20 18claudia_zurich, nancy_portland, rick_sfbay and 17 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report