The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Closing the loop on my own question.
Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence. Two of the three things suggested helped; I cannot separate them and I am not going to pretend otherwise.
lisa_labSD said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultslisa_labSD said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
lisa_labSD said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.