LindaRN_retired said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
LindaRN_retired said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
TirzTom said:True, and anyone with reduced kidney function needs that target set by a clinician rather than a forum.
Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
LindaRN_retired said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
I read this differently from LindaRN_retired, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.