🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsNutrition & SupplementationEating out on GLP-1 — January 2024

Eating out on GLP-1 — January 2024

Dr.NephBHM_UK Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 1:02 PM 12 replies 2,058 viewsPage 1 of 3
This thread is more than 26 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
Dr.NephBHM_UK
Member
456
2,123
Jun 2024
Birmingham, UK
Apr 19, 2024 at 1:02 PM#1

My appetite is suppressed enough that hitting a protein target is now the hardest part of the day, and everything I read assumes I can simply eat more.

The question I want answered is how people are hitting a protein target on a genuinely suppressed appetite, because volume is the binding constraint rather than willingness.

Happy to be told the question itself is wrong.

3 23Dr.CardioMD, EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.RenalNash
VIP Member
1,234
7,890
Mar 2024
Nashville, TN
Apr 19, 2024 at 1:08 PM#2

Short answer first, then the reasoning. On a suppressed appetite the winning strategy is protein density per unit of volume, not per calorie. Isolate powders, Greek yoghurt and cottage cheese, egg whites, lean fish, and tinned tuna all deliver a lot of protein in a small physical volume. Front-load it: appetite is usually least suppressed in the first hours after waking and worst on the day or two after dosing, so get the majority in early in the day and early in the week.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

2 22pam_stl, wei_SG
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JenPlateau
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Missouri
Apr 19, 2024 at 1:14 PM#3
Dr.RenalNash said:
On a suppressed appetite the winning strategy is protein density per unit of volume, not per calorie.

Agreed on the target, with the caveat that reference weight and current weight are different numbers. Using current weight at the start of a large loss produces a target that is both unachievable and unnecessary.

Last edited: Apr 19, 2024 at 7:14 PM
1 21RunnerRach
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
hank_denver
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Denver, CO
Apr 19, 2024 at 1:20 PM#4
Dr.NephBHM_UK said:
My appetite is suppressed enough that hitting a protein target is now the hardest part of the day, and everything I read assumes I can simply eat…

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so. The RDA is the wrong reference and it is worth understanding why. 0.8 g/kg is the intake at which nitrogen balance is not negative in healthy weight-stable adults — a floor for deficiency prevention, not an optimum, and derived in a population that is not in a deficit. In a substantial energy deficit, protein requirement rises because amino acids are being oxidised for energy and because muscle protein synthesis is blunted. The literature on preserving lean mass during weight loss lands around 1.4 to 2.0 g/kg of reference body weight, which is roughly two to two and a half times the RDA.

50 20fiona_VT, denise_HTX, raj_cambridge and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sophie_paris
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Paris, FR
Apr 19, 2024 at 1:52 PM#5

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake:

Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12. Here are the body comp numbers:

BaselineMonth 6Month 12
Total mass264 lbs229 lbs201 lbs
Fat mass104 lbs84 lbs51 lbs
Lean mass157 lbs147 lbs158 lbs
Body fat %41%33%25%

Lean mass preserved — actually GAINED 1-2 lbs thanks to progressive overload + 1.4g/kg protein. The protein intake discussion needs to include body comp data, not just scale weight.

49 19BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros, KetoKyle and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Protein requirements on GLP-1: systematic review of RDA vs optimal intake8 replies
Micronutrient deficiency risk on GLP-1 — B12, D, iron, zinc, folate10 replies
High-protein meal plans for GLP-1 users — 1500-2000 kcal options9 replies
Meal prep Sunday — weekly high-protein recipes thread9 replies
Creatine monohydrate + GLP-1 — safety and lean mass preservation data14 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register