Dr.RaviCardio said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Dr.RaviCardio said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Reporting back.
Update: the thing I was blaming turned out not to be the cause. Leaving the original post as written rather than editing it, so the mistake stays visible for whoever searches this next.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemFollowing on from Dr.RaviCardio — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
anders_CPH said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.