🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsNutrition & SupplementationProbiotics on GLP-1 — my results so far Page 2

Probiotics on GLP-1 — my results so far

MASHdoc_SA Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:59 AM 21 replies 1,344 viewsPage 2 of 5
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
Nov 11, 2025 at 12:16 PM#6
MASHdoc_SA said:
Distribution matters less than total but it is not nothing.

DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake:

Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12. Here are the body comp numbers:

BaselineMonth 6Month 12
Total mass253 lbs243 lbs220 lbs
Fat mass123 lbs73 lbs55 lbs
Lean mass161 lbs148 lbs157 lbs
Body fat %38%34%24%

Lean mass preserved — actually GAINED 1-2 lbs thanks to progressive overload + 1.5g/kg protein. The protein intake discussion needs to include body comp data, not just scale weight.

21 16VendorMark, COA_Karl, MikeFit_NJ and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
pam_columbus
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Columbus, OH
Nov 11, 2025 at 3:56 PM#7

One thing that is still open after NurseLeah_Nash’s answer:

Whether the RDA is the wrong reference entirely during rapid weight loss, and what the actual target should be?

20 15alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE and 17 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
lisa_labSD
Member
278
1,234
Oct 2024
San Diego, CA
Nov 11, 2025 at 7:36 PM#8
DataDave said:
DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake: Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12.

Coming at DataDave’s question from a different direction. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.

Last edited: Nov 11, 2025 at 10:36 PM
19 14Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona, stefan_berlin and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
MASHdoc_SA
Member
456
2,345
Aug 2024
San Antonio, TX
Nov 11, 2025 at 11:16 PM#9

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Reporting back — setting the target on reference weight rather than current weight turned an impossible number into a boring one.

Last edited: Nov 12, 2025 at 2:16 AM
18 13LabKate, kate.chem, DataDave and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LindaRN_retired
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Sarasota, FL
Nov 12, 2025 at 4:49 PM#10
lisa_labSD said:
The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.

True, and anyone with reduced kidney function needs that target set by a clinician rather than a forum. High protein is safe in normal kidneys and is not automatically safe in impaired ones.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

18 16mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Protein requirements on GLP-1: systematic review of RDA vs optimal intake8 replies
Micronutrient deficiency risk on GLP-1 — B12, D, iron, zinc, folate10 replies
High-protein meal plans for GLP-1 users — 1500-2000 kcal options9 replies
Meal prep Sunday — weekly high-protein recipes thread9 replies
Creatine monohydrate + GLP-1 — safety and lean mass preservation data14 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register