hyun_seoul said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
Mine went the same way, slower.
hyun_seoul said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
Coming at hyun_seoul’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
labquiet_amy said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
I read this differently from labquiet_amy, on substance rather than tone. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.